1123Interactive - Technical Consultancy for Founders
MVP Development

How Much Does an MVP Actually Cost?

John Coleman 10 min read

If you’re a non-technical founder researching MVP development, you’ve probably seen price ranges so wide they’re almost useless. “$5,000 to $500,000” doesn’t help you plan. Here’s a more honest answer: for most web and mobile MVPs built by competent developers in 2026, you’re looking at $15,000 to $50,000. The median is probably around $20,000-25,000.

That’s still a range, but it’s a range you can actually work with. Let me break down what drives the number up or down, what you’re actually paying for, and how to think about whether it’s worth it.

What Determines MVP Cost

Complexity of the Core Feature

Every MVP should be built around one core hypothesis you’re testing. The complexity of that core feature is the biggest cost driver.

Lower complexity ($15,000-20,000):

  • Marketplace connecting two user types (basic matching, messaging)
  • Content platform with user accounts and publishing
  • Booking/scheduling system
  • Simple SaaS with a single core workflow
  • Mobile app with standard UI patterns

Higher complexity ($25,000-50,000+):

  • Real-time collaboration features
  • Complex algorithms or data processing
  • Integration with multiple third-party systems
  • Custom hardware or IoT connectivity
  • Regulatory compliance requirements (healthcare, finance)
  • Native mobile apps for both iOS and Android

The question isn’t “how many features” but “how hard are the features.” A simple app with 20 screens might cost less than a complex app with 5.

Platform Choices

Where your MVP lives affects cost significantly.

Web application: Usually the most cost-effective starting point. Works on any device with a browser. Easier to update and iterate.

Single mobile platform (iOS or Android): More expensive than web, but sometimes necessary if your core value proposition requires native device features.

Both mobile platforms: Roughly 1.5-2x the cost of a single platform. Consider whether you really need both at the MVP stage—often you don’t.

💡 Platform Recommendation

For most MVPs, start with web unless there’s a compelling reason to go native. You can always add mobile apps after validation.

Design Requirements

Some MVPs need polished design. Others just need to function.

Functional design (included in base pricing): Clean, usable interfaces using standard UI patterns. Not ugly, but not custom either.

Custom design (adds $3,000-10,000): Unique visual identity, custom illustrations, animation, branded experience. Necessary for consumer products where design is part of the value proposition.

Design-led products (adds $10,000+): When the interface is the product—design tools, creative platforms, consumer apps competing on experience.

Be honest about which category you’re in. A B2B tool for accountants doesn’t need the same design investment as a consumer social app.

Backend Complexity

What happens behind the scenes matters.

Simple backend: User accounts, basic data storage, standard CRUD operations. This is included in base MVP pricing.

Moderate backend: Complex business logic, multiple user roles with different permissions, reporting and analytics, integrations with a few external services.

Complex backend: Real-time data processing, machine learning, complex matching algorithms, enterprise integrations, high-security requirements.

The first two categories fall within typical MVP budgets. The third pushes toward the higher end—and might signal that you’re trying to build too much for an MVP.

What You’re Actually Paying For

When you pay for MVP development, here’s where the money goes:

Discovery and Scoping (5-10% of budget)

Before code gets written, good developers will help you refine what you’re building. This includes understanding your target users and their problems, identifying the core hypothesis you’re testing, scoping the minimum feature set, choosing appropriate technology, and estimating timeline and cost.

This phase often saves money by preventing you from building the wrong thing.

Architecture and Setup (10-15%)

The foundation that everything else builds on: database design, authentication and security setup, deployment infrastructure, development environment configuration, and core application structure.

This work isn’t visible to users but determines whether the product can scale and evolve.

Core Features (50-60%)

The actual functionality users interact with. This is the bulk of the work: user interfaces, business logic, data processing, external integrations, and core workflows.

Testing and Polish (15-20%)

Making sure it actually works: bug fixing, cross-browser/device testing, performance optimization, edge case handling, and user experience refinement.

Deployment and Documentation (5-10%)

Getting it into users’ hands: production deployment, monitoring setup, basic analytics, documentation for future development, and knowledge transfer.

The Three Paths to Getting an MVP Built

Path 1: Offshore Development ($5,000-15,000)

You can find developers overseas willing to build an MVP for $5,000-15,000. Sometimes less.

The appeal is obvious: It’s cheap.

The risks are real

  • Communication challenges across time zones and languages
  • Variable quality with no easy way to assess beforehand
  • Code that works but can't be maintained or extended
  • No strategic input—they build what you ask for, whether or not it's the right thing
  • Security vulnerabilities from copied solutions
  • Limited documentation, if any
  • If something goes wrong, recourse is limited
  • Can range from difficult to impossible to get your source code back at the end of the engagement

Some founders have good experiences with offshore development. Many don’t. The $5,000 MVP that needs to be thrown away and rebuilt for $25,000 wasn’t actually cheap.

If you go this route, budget for the possibility that you’ll need to rebuild. And get a technical advisor to review the code before you rely on it.

Path 2: Premium Agencies ($50,000-150,000+)

Established development agencies with portfolios, project managers, and teams of specialists.

The appeal: Professionalism, polish, reduced risk.

The problems:

  • Most of your budget goes to overhead, not development
  • Hourly billing creates misaligned incentives
  • They build what you ask for, not what you need
  • Scope creep is profitable for them
  • If your idea doesn’t work, you’ve burned your runway

Premium agencies are great for building known things at scale. They’re less suited for early-stage exploration where the goal is learning, not perfection.

Path 3: Experienced Independent Developers ($15,000-35,000)

Solo developers or small teams with significant experience, working directly with founders.

The appeal

  • Direct communication with the person writing code
  • Lower overhead means more of your budget goes to actual development
  • Experience brings pattern recognition and strategic input
  • Fixed pricing aligns incentives

The risks: Dependent on one person’s availability, no team to absorb if someone gets sick or busy, and quality varies—experience doesn’t guarantee competence.

This path often offers the best value for MVP development. You get experience without the agency markup, and direct relationships with people who understand what you’re trying to accomplish.

The key is finding the right person. Look for developers who have built similar things before, who ask good questions about your business (not just your features), and who have references from other founders.

How to Think About the Investment

Compare to the Alternatives

Before deciding whether $20,000 is “too much,” consider what you’d spend otherwise:

The cofounder search: Six months of your time, potential equity giveaway, uncertain outcome. What’s that worth?

The DIY approach: Learning to code takes years. No-code tools have limitations. Your time has value.

Doing nothing: What’s the opportunity cost of not validating your idea? What if someone else builds it while you’re still planning?

$20,000 is a significant investment. It’s also a fixed, known quantity that gets you something concrete in weeks rather than months.

Calculate Per-User Cost

If your MVP helps you acquire your first 100 users, that’s $200 per user in development cost. First 1,000 users? $20 per user.

Those numbers only matter if the users stick around and eventually pay you. But it’s a useful frame: you’re not paying for software, you’re paying for the opportunity to find customers.

Consider the Learning Value

Even if your MVP fails—and many do—you’ll learn something. You’ll learn whether anyone wants the product. You’ll learn what they actually want (often different from what you assumed). You’ll learn about the market, the competition, the operational challenges.

That learning has value. It prevents you from spending years on an idea that was never going to work. It gives you data for your next attempt.

The worst outcome isn’t a failed MVP. It’s never building anything and always wondering.

Financing Options

Not everyone has $20,000 available. That doesn’t mean you can’t get an MVP built.

Payment Plans

Some developers offer payment terms—50% upfront, 50% on delivery, or structured monthly payments. This spreads the cost but typically requires paying in full within 2-3 months.

Extended Financing

Longer-term financing (12-24 months) is less common but exists. Monthly payments of $1,000-1,500 can get you a production MVP, with payments continuing after launch.

This model works particularly well for founders with stable income who believe in their idea but don’t have liquid capital. The monthly commitment is meaningful but sustainable.

What Financing Signals

Key Takeaway

The willingness to make monthly payments is itself a signal. If you can commit to $1,000/month for 18-24 months, you’re demonstrating financial stability, belief in your idea, long-term commitment, and the seriousness that separates you from casual dreamers. These are the same qualities that predict startup success.

The financing isn’t just about spreading cost—it’s about self-selection into a category of founders who are actually ready.

Red Flags in MVP Pricing

Be Cautious If You Encounter

Extremely low quotes: If someone quotes $3,000 for what others quote $20,000, ask why. Maybe they’re using templates and cutting corners. Maybe they’re overseas with the risks that entails. Maybe they’re inexperienced.

Hourly billing with vague scope: “We estimate 200-400 hours at $150/hour” is a recipe for budget overruns. Insist on fixed pricing for defined scope.

No discovery phase: Developers who quote without understanding your business are guessing. That guess will be wrong.

Reluctance to discuss business goals: Good developers ask about your customers, your hypothesis, your success metrics. If they only want to discuss features, they’re building without context.

Promises of perfection: MVPs aren’t supposed to be perfect. They’re supposed to be minimal. Anyone promising a flawless product is either overcharging or overselling.

The Right Mindset

An MVP is not a finished product. It’s an experiment.

You’re paying to test a hypothesis, not to build a business. If the hypothesis is wrong, you’ll need to pivot or try something else. If it’s right, you’ll need to keep building.

Either way, the MVP is step one—not the destination.

Think of the cost as tuition. You’re paying for an education in whether your idea works, delivered in the form of real user data instead of theoretical frameworks.

That’s worth more than another year of planning, researching, and wondering.


MVP development costs real money. The question isn’t whether $15,000-25,000 is expensive—it’s whether it’s worth it compared to the alternatives. For founders with validated problems and commitment to see it through, a well-built MVP is one of the better investments you can make.

Ready to Talk Numbers?

Every project is different, but I can give you a realistic estimate based on what you're trying to build. No obligation, just clarity.

JC

John Coleman

Founder, 1123Interactive

25+ years building products, from consumer electronics scaled to $5M to production SaaS shipped in weeks. Helping founders and businesses turn ideas into working software.

Learn more
Get in Touch

Have a project in mind?

Let's talk about what you're building.

[email protected]